It is quite understandable to question a new thing, and want to know what it is and how it works. This is especially true of new people; our instincts tell us who is a threat and who isn’t usually seconds after we meet them or see them. Sometimes our intuitions can fail us though, and we then turn to a more infallible way to decode somebody. Employers nearly always run background checks on potential employees. Again, this is that basic human instinct running in our veins telling us to find out about people and who they are. Someone could be a great guy in the interview and completely have the wool pulled over your eyes, but when you check his background, you find out he is a convicted felon of a serious charge. Certainly not the type of guy you want working at your business and working with your customers!

While this is a safety issue for the most part, these tests may have a bit of an intrusive value to them, and could be misleading. In psychology, the tendency for people to put more emphasis on the personality than the situation is called the false attribution effect. Many employers are blind to the possible mitigating factors of the offense or the actual person’s turn around in life. Regardless, these types of tests border on the privacy laws that everyone enjoys around the world… for the most part.

Some places have decided the background check simply is not enough though, and that its results are not enough to extrapolate the details of someone’s character. The University of Akron is this place, and instead of a simple background check, they have instituted a full on DNA test, to be sent to a federal reviewer to determine past crimes or not.

This is very invasive, and many privacy advocates are up in arms over these highly inquisitive measures. They also claim that it is against the morals and ethics of a business or corporation to do such testing on its employees, it is a personnel employers responsibility and job to read people, and read them correctly. Whether or not it is legal and whether or not the institute will actually go through with the DNA tests as a full on part of the hiring process, it is the principle of the matter.

What with the Patriot Act, Americans have very little personal freedom left to them, that surely cannot be invaded. While it may be necessary for the government or a business to see your personal files and information, it certainly is not for a hacker or criminal. There are a variety of ways to avoid these criminals, but by far, the best is using an IP changer. You need to be careful online: a change IP proxy can help keep you protected by changing your IP; this will make you impossible to track online, and impossible for anyone to steal ANY information about you.

Be Sociable, Share!

•